Legal Opinion

Nelsen v. Workmen's Compesation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1970No. Docket Nos. 12319, 12397, 12398, 12399PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Each of these four workmen’s compensation cases involves facts of which the following pattern is typical: The employee had been furnished benefits by his employer’s workmen’s compensation carrier. The carrier later intervened or filed a lien claim in the employee’s civil action against an alleged third party tortfeasor for the same injuries. In that action, the court or jury found that the employer’s concurrent negligence was a proximate cause of the injuries. The employee recovered from the third party by judgment or by settlement made at or after trial. Then the employee…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Corley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Carden v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Serrano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Gilford v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API