Legal Opinion

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Starley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1946No. L. A. 19479PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant entered on a directed verdict.

Denver-Chieago Trucking Company, -hereinafter referred to as carrier, was engaged as a common carrier, in the transportation by truck of personal property owned by plaintiff. In the course thereof defendant’s car collided with the carrier’s truck containing the property, resulting in a partial destruction of the property. Prior to the commencement of this action the carrier paid plaintiff’s claim for the damage to the property presumably under the law providing: “Unless the consignor accompanies the freight and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illinois Central Ry. v. HicklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. Franklin v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Moltz, to Use v. Sherwood Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Patent Scaffolding Co. v. William Simpson Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. De Cruz v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
  5. American Fidelity & Casualty Co., Inc. v. All American Bus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API