Legal Opinion
State v. Bradbury
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 13, 1986No. 37744, 37745; CA A35697, A35698PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*615RICHARDSON, P. J.
In this consolidated appeal, defendant appeals two convictions for burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to suppress his confessions and evidence that the police seized without a search warrant from his sister’s apartment. We affirm.
Defendant was under arrest and in custody at the police station when, after appropriate Miranda warnings, he stated that he wanted to talk to an attorney. Officer Sawyer asked him if he could search the apartment where defendant lived with his sister. Defendant consented, and the police seized…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. FerroNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. KellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. NorkeveckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. DoreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.