Legal Opinion

People v. Ferro

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1984PublishedCited by 226 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Meyer, J.

What constitutes “interrogation” of a suspect who, after Miranda warnings, has declined to answer questions is determined not by the subjective intent of the police, but by whether an objective observer with the same knowledge concerning the suspect as the police had would conclude that the remark or conduct of the police was reasonably likely to elicit a response.1 Because applying that test we conclude that the conduct of the police in placing in front of the cell in which defendant was being detained furs stolen from the murder victim’s residence constituted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by226 opinions

  1. People v. Ramirez-PortorealNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. People v. PaulmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. People v. BetheaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. CentanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. Thomas Norman GayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API