Legal Opinion

State v. Kell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1986No. 10-83-01182; CA A28691PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated murder, ORS 163.095(2)(c), assigning as error the admission in evidence of two separate sets of his statements to the police: those taken after he had allegedly requested an attorney and others made after a second request for an attorney. The second set was ruled inadmissible in the state’s case in chief but was admitted in rebuttal to impeach defendant’s testimony. He further assigns as error the denial of his motions to grant a co-defendant immunity as a defense witness and to exclude the testimony of a state’s rebuttal witness on the ground…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MageeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. KellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. RoweCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. BradburyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API