Legal Opinion

State v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 13, 2002No. C9903-32190; A107209PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Defendant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. On appeal, he argues that the trial court should have suppressed a statement that he made when the arresting officer asked him, incident to a pat-down search, if he “ha[d] anything that would hurt me or was sharp?” Defendant argues that, because the officer’s question constituted interrogation, he could not ask that question until defendant had been advised of and waived his Miranda rights. We affirm.

In March 1999, Officer Thomas McNurney noticed a fairly clean pickup truck, the rear license plate of which was obscured by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. DelongOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. KooymanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  5. State v. SCHWERBELCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API