Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 30, 2010No. MI070821; A139006PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, the trial court suppressed a statement by defendant that she would refuse to take a breath test because, having consumed two glasses of wine, she feared that she would not pass. According to the trial court, defendant’s statements were inadmissible because police officers did not give her Miranda warnings. The state appeals. ORS 138.060(l)(c). Defendant cross-appeals, arguing that police did not have probable cause to arrest her. We reverse and remand on appeal and affirm on cross-appeal.

The facts are not in dispute. Officer May,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SwanOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. HigleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. SwanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. Delgado-RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. CartierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API