Legal Opinion

Eckblad v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 16, 1985No. C2-85-83PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Dorothy Eckblad appeals from a judgment which determined her rights to uninsured benefits occasioned by the death of her husband. The court determined that the uninsured loss should be apportioned between National Family Insurance Company (National Family), State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), and Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (Farm Bureau). The court ordered each company to pay that proportion of the damages that the liability limits of its policies bear to the total of the uninsured coverage available. On appeal, Eckblad claims that State Farm and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. CurrierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kowler Associates v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Benson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. AFSCME Council 14 v. St. Paul Ramsey HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API