Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Mutual Insurance v. Currier

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 20, 1976No. 45717PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

Defendant, Fred E. Currier, pursuant to an arbitration clause in his insurance policy, made a written demand for arbitration of his claim for damages caused by injuries which he sustained in an automobile accident with an uninsured driver. Plaintiff, Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Company, Currier’s insurer, resisted arbitration and applied to the district court pursuant to Minn. St. 572.09(b) to stay arbitration proceedings. The basis for plaintiff’s application was its contention that a prior court determination was res judicata as to defendant’s claim for damages and that,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Eric A. Carlstrom Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 77Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Costello v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API