Reinhardt v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant, an underinsured motorist (UIM), argues that the district court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment when he had, with the insurer’s knowledge, established by jury trial the amount he is “legally entitled to recover” from the tortfea-sor. Appellant also claims postjudgment interest. We vacate the judgment and remand.
FACTS
In January 1988, appellant Leonard Reinhardt was driving a van owned by Supreme Electric, Inc., when the van was struck by a car driven by Joseph Kieffer. Kieffer was insured by Minnesota Mutual for $100,000 per accident. Supreme…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SourasCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- National Indemnity Co. v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Briggs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Merritt v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- American States Insurance Co. v. AnkrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Malmin v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996