Legal Opinion
Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 20, 2007No. 2006-1501PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
Crawfish Processors Alliance, Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, and Bob Odom, Commissioner, (collectively “CPA”) appeal from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the scope ruling by the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) that crawfish etouffee is not included within the scope of an antidump-ing duty order covering freshwater craw-fish tail meat. Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States, 431 F.Supp.2d 1342 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2006). Because substantial evidence supports Commerce’s determination that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
3Cited by14 opinions
- Meridian Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Walgreen Co. of Deerfield, Il v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Ams Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Mid Continent Nail Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.