Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
I
Introduction
Plaintiffs Crawfish Processors Alliance (“CPA”), the Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, and Bob Odom, Commissioner, are contesting the exclusion of crawfish etouffee from the antidumping duty order covering prepared and preserved freshwater crawfish tail meat, arguing that Commerce failed to conduct an anti-circumvention inquiry as part of its overall scope investigation to determine the products subject to the antidumping duty order. Plaintiffs challenge the final scope determination by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce” or “the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Nature's Touch Frozen Foods (West) Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023