Legal Opinion

Levy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1940No. L. A. 17421PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This proceeding in mandamus presents the question whether the provisions of title X of part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply to an arbitration award made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.

On November 3, 1939, a collective bargaining agreement was entered into between David Shann Corporation, women’s garment manufacturer, as the employer, called the firm, and International Ladies’ Garment Workers' Union, called the union, acting on behalf of all its members. Prior to that date and in August, 1939, a labor dispute arose between the union and the firm with reference to working…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Goldstein v. Int. L. G. W. U.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Goldstein v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' UnionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Chavez v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Petri Cleaners, Inc. v. Automotive Employees, Laundry Drivers & Helpers Local No. 88California Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Montalvo v. ZamoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API