Legal Opinion

Jones v. Poole

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 18, 1998No. 97-1430PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

In this appeal, we affirm the trial court's ruling that Melvin R. Jones, a permissive user of a motor vehicle insured by State Farm Insurance Companies, is bound by the arbitration provisions of the insurance policy governing an uninsured motorist claim. We also affirm the court's ruling that Jones is bound by the provision which requires a claimant to share the costs of the arbitration with State Farm. However, we reverse the court's further ruling that Jones is also obligated for State Farm's taxable costs.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts and history of this case are simple and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicholson v. Home Insurance Companies, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. City of Mequon v. Lake Estates Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Manu-Tronics, Inc. v. Effective Management Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. Finkenbinder v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Esad Osmic v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Kiss v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Briggs v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  4. Ceme-Tube LLC v. Chroma Color CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
  5. Esad Osmic v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API