Legal Opinion
Kiss v. General Motors Corp.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided May 9, 2001No. 00-0626PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
¶ 1. This case presents two issues of first impression under Wis. Stat. § 218.015 (1997 — 98), Wisconsin's "Lemon Law." The first is whether a manufacturer fulfills its obligation to provide a "comparable new motor vehicle" under § 218.015(2)(b) by offering to replace a consumer's nonconforming tow truck with a new cab and chassis but without a new tow unit. Based on prior case law interpreting the language and public policy of the Lemon Law, we conclude that the statute requires the replacement of a nonconforming tow truck with a new tow unit along with the new cab and chassis.
¶ 2. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- M & I First National Bank v. Episcopal Homes Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Harold L. Bushendorf v. Freightliner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Morris v. Juneau CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Deputy v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Bcr Trucking, LLC v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Bruce Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.