Legal Opinion

Esad Osmic v. Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 10, 2014No. 12–1295PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

We must decide whether a policy provision limiting the time to file an action to recover underinsured motorist’s benefits is binding on a passenger who was injured while riding in the named insured’s vehicle. The passenger brought this action approximately one month after the deadline set forth in the policy, which required suit to be commenced “within two years after the date of the accident.”

We conclude the passenger, as an insured and a third-party beneficiary of the policy, does not have greater rights than the policyholder. Thus, the passenger cannot avoid the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dale Boelman and Nancy Boelman v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Ex Parte DyessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. Morgan v. American Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  5. Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rose v. American Family Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Azoroh v. Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, ConnecticutDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  4. Benskin, Inc. v. West BankCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020
  5. Dean Snyder Construction Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API