Legal Opinion

Reith v. McGill Smith Punshon, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2005No. C-040760PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Leonard and Vida Reith experienced extensive flooding of their driveway and house from 1993 until 2003. The Reiths believed that the flooding was caused by the construction in the early 1990s of the Chatham Woods subdivision on the farmland across the street from their house. The Reiths sued defendant-appellee Parrott & Strawser Properties, Inc., the developer of the subdivision, and defendant-appellee McGill Smith Punshon, Inc., the engineering company that had designed the water-drainage system for the subdivision.

{¶ 2} The trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kunz v. Buckeye Union Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Harris v. ListonOhio Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sexton v. City of MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Bonkoski v. Lorain Cnty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Creech v. Brock & Associates Construction, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer Dist. v. Bath Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API