Legal Opinion
Harris v. Liston
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 25, 1999No. 98-1338PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
Appellees’ negligence claims against Jackson are governed by R.C. 2305.09(D), which sets forth a general limitations period for tort actions not specifically covered by other statutory sections. Specifically, R.C. 2305.09(D) requires that claims predicated on damage to real property “be brought within four years after the cause thereof accrued.” See Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc. (1982), 69 Ohio St.2d 376, 23 O.O.3d 346, 433 N.E.2d 147, paragraph one of the syllabus; and NCR Corp. v. U.S. Mineral Products Co. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 269, 271, 649 N.E.2d 175, 176-177, citing Sun…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Zimmie v. Calfee, Halter & GriswoldOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Investors REIT One v. JacobsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Velotta v. Leo Petronzio Landscaping, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Metz v. Unizan BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Sexton v. City of MasonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. E. Cleveland Fire Fighters' Assn., Local 500, IAFF v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Union Savings Bank v. Lawyers Title InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.