Sexton v. City of Mason
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} This appeal requires us to address issues regarding the statute of limitations that is applicable to claims for damage to real property occasioned by rainwater draining from adjacent land.
{¶ 2} Plaintiffs-appellants, Larry and Peggy Sexton, assert that flooding and erosion on their property was caused by the defendants’ negligent acts on the adjoining property. The trial court and the court of appeals determined that the statute of limitations for appellants’ claims expired prior to the filing of their suit because their claims were not based on a continuing trespass but on a permanent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anthony J. Nieman v. Nlo, Inc. And Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Kansas Pacific Railway v. MihlmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Harris v. ListonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Abraham v. BP Exploration & Oil, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State v. SwartzOhio Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Allen v. Andersen Windows, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Brown v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Naiman Family Partners, L.P. v. SaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Lally v. BP Products North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.