Legal Opinion

Eaton v. J. H. Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1978No. 9451PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment finding certain of the appellants, who were defendants below, liable for damages resulting from breach of their contract with respondent J. H. INC., aka JACK HARPER, INC., aka CUSTOMUSIC INCORPORATED [hereafter Customusic], and from dismissal of their third-party complaint against respondents Western Diversified, Charles L. McCarty and Ann P. McCarty.

1. The Facts.

In 1972 appellant Earl Eaton and his partner, Paul Alexander, owners of the Oasis Bowl, negotiated an agreement with Customusic, a supplier of pool tables and game machines. Cus-tomusic agreed…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Christmas v. CooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  2. F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co. v. HartneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Schubert v. Midwest Broadcasting Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cladianos v. FriedhoffNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. ShawcrossNevada Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. County of Clark v. Bonanza No. 1Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brown v. Kinross Gold U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2008
  3. Donovan v. SchmouteyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
  4. American Heritage, Inc. v. Nevada Gold & Casino, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. General Electric Supply Co. v. Mt. Wheeler Power, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API