Legal Opinion

County of Clark v. Bonanza No. 1

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1980No. 11502, 11706PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Batjer, J.:

This case involves the validity of an indemnity agreement whereby Nathan Jacobson and Bonanza No. 2 promised to pay to Clark County the amount of any condemnation award received by Ruth and Arby Alper for a parcel of land underlying Flamingo Road. We affirm the summary judgment in favor of Bonanza No. 1, Tracy Investment Co., J. J. Enterprises, and T. L. Corporation because they did not assume the obligation to indemnify the county. We deny the writ of mandate because the agreement is not clearly unenforceable against Jacobson and Bonanza No. 2.

In 1959, Arby and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lipshie v. Tracy Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Harvey's Wagon Wheel, Inc. v. MacSweenNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. Recrion CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gruntorad v. Hughes BrothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Albert H. Wohlers & Co. v. BartgisNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gianetti v. Norwalk HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Canfora v. Coast Hotels & Casinos, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. GuestHouse International, LLC v. Shoney's North America Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  5. Cain v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API