Legal Opinion

Cladianos v. Friedhoff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1952No. 3664PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is an action brought by the respondent, Friedhoff, as plaintiff asking damages for breach of contract. The contract involved was one for the performance of personal services by Friedhoff to appellant, Cladianos. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, found for Friedhoff and granted judgment in the sum of $7,500 (plus the additional sum of $176.11 which is not in dispute) . This appeal is from that judgment and from the court’s subsequent order denying motion for new trial. The parties will be referred to by name.

The questions raised upon this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Bradley v. Nevada-California-Oregon RailwayNevada Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Thomas Jessup, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Fish v. FleishmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Covington Bros. v. Valley Plastering, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Eaton v. J. H. Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kahle v. KostinerNevada Supreme Court · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API