Legal Opinion

State v. Wallway

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 1994No. 14042-0-II; 14336-4-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

In this consolidated appeal, Donald Ray Wallway and Daniel Hoinowski each appeal their conviction on a charge of unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance. Both contend that the trial court erred in not suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant, and in refusing to order disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant. Wallway, alone, contends that the information charging him with unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance was deficient in that it did not include all of the elements of the charge. We affirm each defendant's conviction.

On February 27, 1989, a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LeuppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. State v. Nunez-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. TunneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API