Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1992No. 57883-4, 57884-2, 57885-1, 57886-9PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

Clyde Johnson, Denise Cole, Gordon Dickerson, and Juan Campos were convicted of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. Before trial or plea, all four defendants unsuccessfully moved to dismiss, contending their charging documents were defective. The defendants argued the State's informations were insufficient because they only alleged the defendants "unlawfully" delivered cocaine and did not specify the defendants knew the identity of the substance delivered. The Court of Appeals affirmed all four convictions, publishing only its opinion in State v. Johnson, 59 Wn. App. 867, 802 P.2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. BoyerWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. PelkeyWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 2004

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API