Legal Opinion
State v. Leupp
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 9, 1999No. 22448-8-IIPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
James M. Leupp appeals from a conviction of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. He challenges the superior court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
Findings of Fact. We paraphrase the findings of fact that the trial court entered to support the suppression decision, CrR 3.6(b). In the early hours of July 6, 1997, an intoxicated person made a “911 hang-up call” from Leupp’s residence. Grays Harbor Deputy Sheriff Keith Peterson responded. At the front door, Peterson spoke with Leupp and two females, Roberta Schumacher and Michelle Frost; everyone in the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. FerrierWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. KalakoskyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. KinzyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. RaynorWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.