Legal Opinion

In Re Perrigo

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2723PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The application in this ease relates to “Method and Apparatus for Accumulating and Transforming Ether Electric Energy,” and embraces 36 claims of which numbers 1, 15, 21, and 32 seem fairly representative:

“1. The production and generation of an electromotive force from the accumulation of the ether waves of an unknown potential, from the general field of ether wave electric medium.”
“15. The method and apparatus herein described for collecting and accumulating from the general ether field of electric medium of unknown polarity, of ether waves of electromotive force,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  2. In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  4. In Re OberwegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. H. C. Baxter & Bro. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API