Legal Opinion

In Re Oberweger

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1940No. Patent Appeal 4386PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appellant has here appealed from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which affirmed, in re'spects hereinafter specifically pointed out, the decision of the Primary Examiner, rejecting certain claims relating to an alleged invention for a composition, and method of using the same, in treating the scalp for the purpose of producing hair growth.

The claims of the application are twelve in number. Claims 1, 2, 3, 5 and 12 are regarded as illustrative and read:

“1. The method of treating the scalp which comprises applying thereto a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coupe v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Lamb Knit Goods Co. v. Lamb Glove & Mitten Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  3. In Re PerrigoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  4. Besser v. Merrilat Culvert Core Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  5. Hall v. Duart Sales Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. In Re Joyce A. CortrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  4. Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Decker v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API