McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Sam B. McQueen applied to the South Carolina Coastal Council1 for permits to bulkhead2 and backfill two nonconti*591guous lots he owns in the Cherry Grove section of North Myrtle Beach. The Coastal Council denied the permits, and McQueen appealed to the circuit court. The matter was referred to the master-in-equity to enter a decision with finality. The master found a taking had occurred and ordered that McQueen be compensated $100,000. The Coastal Council appeals. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1961, Sam McQueen bought a lot on 53rd…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dorman v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.