Legal Opinion
McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 17, 2000No. 25108PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
Petitioner South Carolina Coastal Council 1 appeals the decision of the Court of Appeals holding Coastal Council’s denial of permits to bulkhead and fill lots owned by respondent constituted a taking requiring just compensation. McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 329 S.C. 588, 496 S.E.2d 643 (Ct.App.1998). We reverse.
FACTS
Respondent purchased a lot on 53rd Avenue in the Cherry Grove section of North Myrtle Beach in 1961 for $2500, and a lot on 48th Avenue in 1963 for $1700. Each lot is valued at $22,800 for tax purposes. Both lots are located on manmade, saltwater…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loveladies Harbor, Inc. And Loveladies Harbor, Unit D, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Westside Quik Shop, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Dorman v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Dorman v. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND ENV.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002