Legal Opinion
Staubes v. City of Folly Beach
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 27, 1998No. 2834PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Judge:
Vernon Staubes brought this action to recover damages he allegedly sustained due to the City of Folly Beach’s refusal to grant him a permit to repair his- duplex. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment holding the City’s actions did not (1) result in a taking of Staubes’s property; (2) violate Staubes’s right to due process; or (3) violate 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Additionally, the court found Staubes’s negligence action was barred by the South Carolina Tort Claims Act. 1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 2
FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Young v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Hawkins v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Proctor v. Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Restaurant Row Associates v. Horry CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.