McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
This regulatory takings case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court to reconsider our previous decision 1 in light of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 121 S.Ct. 2448, 150 L.Ed.2d 592 (2001).
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In the early 1960’s, respondent McQueen purchased two non-contiguous lots located on manmade saltwater canals in the Cherry Grove section of North Myrtle Beach. He paid $2,500 in 1961 for a lot on 53rd Avenue and $1,700 in 1963 for a lot on 48th Avenue. Since then, both lots have remained unimproved. The lots surrounding McQueen’s are improved…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Query v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- White's Mill Colony, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Estate of Tenney v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Town of YemasseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Jowers v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.