Legal Opinion

McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal Council

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 28, 2003No. 25642PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

This regulatory takings case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court to reconsider our previous decision 1 in light of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 121 S.Ct. 2448, 150 L.Ed.2d 592 (2001).

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

In the early 1960’s, respondent McQueen purchased two non-contiguous lots located on manmade saltwater canals in the Cherry Grove section of North Myrtle Beach. He paid $2,500 in 1961 for a lot on 53rd Avenue and $1,700 in 1963 for a lot on 48th Avenue. Since then, both lots have remained unimproved. The lots surrounding McQueen’s are improved…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Lloyd A. Good, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Rice Hope Plantation v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Query v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  2. White's Mill Colony, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Estate of Tenney v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Wilson v. Town of YemasseeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Jowers v. S.C. Dep't of Health & Envtl. ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API