Legal Opinion
Odhinn v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2003No. 02-281PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[11] Janvirgo Thunor Akihoka Odhinn appeals a district court's order denying his motion to dismiss eriminal charges filed against him in Wyoming based upon alleged violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). He claims his statutory and constitutional rights to a speedy trial were violated when he was not brought to trial within 180 days of the date Wyoming received notification of his request for final disposition of the charges. We hold Mr. Odhinn's right under the IAD to final disposition within 180 days was violated and reverse the district court's order.
ISSUES
[…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Thomas NesbittCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In the Interest of KP v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Carlos Yammon Pena v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Trumbull v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Merchant v. State Department of CorrectionsWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Ronald Wayne Crebs III v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.