Legal Opinion

In the Interest of KP v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2004No. C-04-6PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[11] KP appeals from an order adjudicating him delinquent and the corresponding order of disposition. Finding that KP's adjudication was based upon one allegation that was determined pursuant to an inaccurate application of a statute, we remand the case for the entry of a new order of adjudication. Because the current order of adjudication must be vacated, the current order of disposition also is vacated. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ISSUES

[12] KP presents four issues for review by this Court:

I. Was there sufficient competent evidence adduced…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. McArtor v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State Board of Equalization v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stutzman v. Office of the Wyoming State EngineerWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Alex Jordan Vaughn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Northern Laramie Range Foundation v. Converse County Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. In the Interest of CT v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API