Legal Opinion
Plumb v. Prinslow
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 14, 1994No. CV 92-442-ASPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PANNE R, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Plumb brings this action for damages against county and state officials whose actions (or inaction) allegedly resulted in plaintiff being wrongly imprisoned for seventy days after the date on which he should have been released from custody. Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas filed two sets of Findings and Recommendations, one on October 7, 1993 and another on November 24, 1993. The Magistrate Judge recommended granting defendants’ motion for qualified immunity (#23) on grounds plaintiff had no liberty interest in credits for time served, and thus defendants…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Russell v. LazarDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Biberdorf v. OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Nelson v. StalderDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.