Russell v. Lazar
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Clay E. Russell brings this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendants William L. Lazar and Jim R. Plaint, Wisconsin correctional officials, violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments by miscalculating his prison sentence and thereby causing him to be confined for sixty-five days beyond his mandatory release (“MR”) date. Although the complaint is somewhat unclear, plaintiff appears to allege that from June 4 to August 9, 2000 he was unlawfully imprisoned because defendants miscalculated his MR date. He…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Cruz-Caraballo v. RodriguezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
- Harris v. State of TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Hatcher v. SaldanaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022