Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1999No. 97-05-28-838-M; CA A100349Published

1Opinion of the Court

974 P.2d 260 (1999)

158 Or. App. 276

George F. HAMEL, Appellant,

v.

Dan JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution, Respondent.

97-05-28-838-M; CA A100349.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on November 20, 1998.

Decided February 10, 1999.

Bob Pangburn argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

David Amesbury, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, Presiding Judge, and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, Judges.

EDMONDS, J.

Plaintiff…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Hamel v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Payton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Beveridge v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API