Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKinney
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
This is an appeal from a chancery court judgment imposing a six month suspension from the practice of law on Appellant, James R. McKinney. The Board of Professional Responsibility filed a petition for discipline against McKinney alleging generally that he had been guilty of negligence and incompetence in his representation of each of four clients, Willie Lee Davis, Richard A. Martin, Edward 0. Hill and Marie 0. Powell. The petition alleges misconduct and cites violations of several disciplinary rules. McKinney, in his answer, takes issue with the allegations that any…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. MartinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- State v. DoeTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Gillock v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Scruggs v. BracyTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gibson v. TrantTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Matter of WolframArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Nevin v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Blocker v. DearbornCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. BonningtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.