Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 10, 1981PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court on a petition for post-conviction relief. The pro se petition alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective in the preparation and conduct of the trial and that his motion for a new trial was not filed within the time required by law, hampering his right to appeal. The court authorized the late filing of a motion for a new trial pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-3820(3) but otherwise denied the petition. The petitioner has elected to abandon a direct appeal after the filing of a motion for a new trial and has pursued an appeal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Raymond L. Buckelew and James Laney Jenkins v. United States of America, Judson Lee Drane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  4. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
  5. Janow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. State v. BufordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Vermilye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API