State v. Martin
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TATUM, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court on a petition for post-conviction relief. The pro se petition alleged that his trial counsel was ineffective in the preparation and conduct of the trial and that his motion for a new trial was not filed within the time required by law, hampering his right to appeal. The court authorized the late filing of a motion for a new trial pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-3820(3) but otherwise denied the petition. The petitioner has elected to abandon a direct appeal after the filing of a motion for a new trial and has pursued an appeal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Baxter v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
- Raymond L. Buckelew and James Laney Jenkins v. United States of America, Judson Lee Drane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1974
- Janow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State v. MelsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- State v. BufordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Vermilye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.