Legal Opinion

Scruggs v. Bracy

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1981PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

This appeal involves the petition of Harry U. Scruggs, Jr., for reinstatement to the practice of law, pursuant to Rule 9 Section 19, Rules of the Supreme Court.1 Petitioner seeks review in this Court of the denial of his petition for reinstatement by the trial court.

On November 29, 1977, following the af-firmance of a criminal conviction in federal court, this Court entered an order suspending the petitioner from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 42 Section 14, now Rule 9 Section 14. Thereafter, Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition before the Disciplinary Board,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Harry U. Scruggs, Sr., and Harry U. Scruggs, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. SlavinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dockery v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ramsey v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Gillock v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API