Legal Opinion

Gillock v. Board of Professional Responsibility

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

The Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee has appealed from an order suspending Senator Edgar Gillock from the practice of law for six months for failing “to properly avoid the appearance of professional impropriety as set forth in Canon Nine of the Code of Professional Responsibility.” The Board insists that the suspension ordered by the trial judge is inadequate. It also insists that the evidence preponderates against the findings of the trial judge exonerating Mr. Gillock of charges of influence peddling and bribery. In our opinion,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Service Fire Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Scruggs v. BracyTennessee Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Walton v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Randolph v. RandolphTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. SlavinTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dockery v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. McKinneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API