Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Bonds

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 2008No. 80995-0PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. Johnson, J.

¶1 — We are asked to determine whether, under the facts of this case, we will recognize equitable tolling as an exception to the time bar provided under RCW 10.73.090 and permit Robert Charles Bonds, Jr., to submit an otherwise untimely amended personal restraint petition (PRP). The Court of Appeals applied equitable tolling to *138allow Bonds to amend his PRP more than one year after his judgment and sentence became final. This permitted Bonds to raise a claim alleging violation of his right to a public trial and the public’s right to open court proceedings. The Court of Appeals granted relief,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of RunyanWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re the Personal Restraint of HoisingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of HaghighiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Marlon Mormann v. Iowa Workforce DevelopmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. In Re CarterWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of CarterWashington Supreme Court · 2011

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API