Matter of Personal Restraint of Runyan
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
These three factually unrelated personal restraint petitions (PRPs) challenge the constitutionality of RCW 10.73.090 et seq. (the statute) which, with certain exceptions, require postconviction petitions for collateral relief to be filed within 1 year after the conviction becomes final. The petitioners argue that this time limit acts to suspend the writ of habeas corpus in violation of article 1, section 13 of our constitution. They also argue that the statute violates the equal protection clauses of both the federal and state constitutions. Alternatively, petitioners urge that, regardless of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In re the Personal Restraint of BennWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.