Saporta v. Barbagelata
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of two of the six defendants in the action.
Question Presented
Was the trial court justified in granting the motion for a summary judgment ?
Statement of the Case
The action in the instant case is one for rescission on the ground of fraud. The action is brought against two sellers of real property, a real estate broker, a real estate agent, an exterminator company, and a lumber company. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that they were the purchasers of certain real property, improved with a house, owned by defendants Otto and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Strawn v. CanusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Neveroski v. BlairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.