Legal Opinion

Saporta v. Barbagelata

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1963No. Civ. 20996PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a summary judgment in favor of two of the six defendants in the action.

Question Presented

Was the trial court justified in granting the motion for a summary judgment ?

Statement of the Case

The action in the instant case is one for rescission on the ground of fraud. The action is brought against two sellers of real property, a real estate broker, a real estate agent, an exterminator company, and a lumber company. Plaintiffs allege in their complaint that they were the purchasers of certain real property, improved with a house, owned by defendants Otto and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Strawn v. CanusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Neveroski v. BlairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API