Legal Opinion

Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1900No. Nos. 12,223—(266)PublishedCited by 55 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Henne-pin county, McGee, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

This action was brought to restrain the city of Minneapolis, its mayor, chief of police, and city engineer, from the threatened enforcement of certain ordinances, as illegal interferences with the rights of the plaintiff in the use of its telephone system and exchanges in that city. , A demurrer was interposed by the defendants denying the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action. The court below sustained the demurrer, from which order plaintiff appeals.

The complaint- sets forth at length the grievances of which plaintiff complains, and facts which justify its fears that the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. City Railway Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Pikes Peak Power Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. State ex rel. Freeman v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  4. City of Lansing v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Englewood v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1967

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API