Legal Opinion

Shaham v. John Capparelli

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 4, 1991No. 14165PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this personal injury action, we granted the plaintiffs petition for certification in order to consider whether the Appellate Court correctly sustained a ruling of the trial court precluding the plaintiff from offering certain rebuttal evidence.1 Shaham *134v. Capparelli, 23 Conn. App. 468, 470-73, 581 A.2d 1065 (1990). The Appellate Court, considering this issue among others, affirmed the judgment of the trial court that the plaintiff, Basma Shaham, was not entitled to set aside or to have an additur to enhance a jury verdict that had awarded her $11,300 in damages for injuries allegedly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  2. Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. LisellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Dimaio v. PanicoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Shaham v. CapparelliConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ham v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Pie Plate, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  4. Mezes v. MeadConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Roberto v. Honeywell, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API