Legal Opinion

Dimaio v. Panico

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 5, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff suffered injuries by reason of a collision between an automobile driven by him and one driven by one of the defendants at a street intersection. The defendants’ car approached the intersection on the right of the plaintiff. Each party claimed the right of way, the defendants under the statute in effect at the time of the accident (General Statutes, § 1639) and the plaintiff' upon the ground that the vehicles were not approaching the intersection at approximately the same time but that he arrived at and entered it well ahead of the defendants. The plaintiff assigns as error the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Correnti v. CatinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Hathaway v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Mahoney v. Hartford Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  4. Rooney v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reboni v. Case Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Season-All Industries, Inc. v. R. J. Grosso, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. LisellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Rosenfield v. CymbalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  5. DeMartin v. Yale-New Haven HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API