Legal Opinion
State v. Lisella
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 8, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in permitting the state to introduce relevant evidence in rebuttal which could have been introduced earlier in the state’s case and which contradicted the defendant’s testimony and other evidence presented by the defense.
After a trial to a jury, the defendant was found guilty of violation of an act relating to dependency-producing drugs; General Statutes §19-480 (a); and was sentenced to a term of not less than two nor more than five years. The defendant was accused of selling heroin to an undercover police officer, after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BrigandiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. GraytonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. LeopoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- State v. PalozieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. NimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. WoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. CavellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.