Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harms v. Independent School District No. 300

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 1989No. CX-88-2226Published

1DissentRandall, Judge

I respectfully dissent. I would have affirmed the trial court.

Strand and Westgard1 mandate realignment,2 but only when placing a teacher on unrequested leave of absence (ULA). As the trial court correctly observed, neither the Minnesota Supreme Court nor the legislature has specifically extended the principle of realignment to the reinstatément procedures used when staff are called back from ULA.

*526There are substantial differences between placing a teacher on ULA, and calling one back. The decision to place staff on ULA is made and the people involved are given formal notice in the spring of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Westgard v. Independent School District No. 745Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API