Legal Opinion

Sherek v. Independent School Dist. No. 699, Gilbert

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1990No. C8-88-1284Published

1Opinion of the Court

449 N.W.2d 434 (1990)

Donald P. SHEREK, Appellant,

v.

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 699, GILBERT, Minnesota, Respondent, and

Thomas Beste, Laurance Kleven, and David Kriska, rule 19 defendants, Respondents.

No. C8-88-1284.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 5, 1990.

Richard L. Kaspari, Garber & Kaspari, St. Louis Park, for appellant.

Scott C. Neff, Neff & Lager, Virginia, for School Dist. # 699.

Brad P. Engdahl, Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, Minneapolis, for rule 19 defendant Kleven.

Don L. Bye, Duluth, for rule 19 defendant Beste.

Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.

KEITH, Justice.

A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Sherek v. Independent School Dist. No. 699, GilbertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Walter v. Independent School District No. 457Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Beste v. Independent School District No. 697Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API