Legal Opinion

Renstrom v. Independent School District No. 261

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1986No. C1-86-179PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Eleanor Renstrom brought a declaratory judgment action asking the trial court to determine her rights and the rights of the respondents, Ashby and Evansville school districts, under Minn.Stat. § 122.541 (1984). On appeal, Renstrom argues that the trial court erred when it determined (1) that Minn.Stat. § 122.541 did not apply to the facts of the case; (2) that the two school districts had entered into a valid Joint Powers Agreement; and (3) that Renstrom was not entitled to reinstatement under Minn.Stat. § 125.12, subd. 6b(e) (1984). We affirm.

FACTS

Eleanor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ullom v. Independent School District No. 112Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Lucio v. School Board of Independent School District No. 625Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Flaherty v. Independent School District No. 2144Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Sherek v. Independent School District No. 699Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API